Visit Image Gallery

 

National Network TO

End The War

Against Iraq

Map of Network Members

 

Up | Home | Member Area | Downloads | About the Network | About Sanctions | Donate Now

Bulletin Board  | Current Actions | Upcoming Actions | Local Actions | Past Actions | Op Eds

 

 

Daschle: Don't Politicize Life and Death: Bush should Apologize

By DAVID ESPO

September 25th, 2002

WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle accused President Bush  on Wednesday of playing politics with the debate over war in Iraq, and demanded the commander in chief "apologize to the American people." Photo"We ought not politicize this war," Daschle, S.D., said in blunt remarks on the Senate floor less than six weeks before the midterm elections. "We ought not politicize the rhetoric about war and life and death."

No apology was forthcoming at the White House, where spokesman Ari Fleischer said Daschle's attacks misstated comments Bush made earlier this week.

At the same time, the spokesman declined numerous times to say whether Bush stood by his remark that the Senate — controlled by Democrats — was "not interested in the security of the American people." And Fleischer said Bush believes that if the Senate does not pass legislation to create a new Department of Homeland Security, "the security of our country will not have been protected."

White House officials also worked behind the scenes with GOP allies in Congress to rebut Daschle, the nation's highest elected Democratic official.

"Who is the enemy here, the president of the United States or Saddam Hussein?" asked Trent Lott, R-Miss., the Senate GOP leader.

Ironically, Daschle leveled his charge at the same time Democratic congressional aides were closeted with administration officials, seeking a compromise on legislation that would authorize Bush to use force to eliminate Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Referring to the secretive talks, House Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt told reporters, "We're in the early stages and we have a way to go. I don't know whether we'll pull that off or not."

Several sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that in the negotiations, the White House had signaled a willingness to delete language from its initial draft that permitted the use force to "restore international peace and security in the region." Some Democrats have objected to the provision, saying it grants Bush authority that goes far beyond Iraq.

Additionally, these sources said the negotiations focused on whether and when Bush would be required to report to Congress on the situation in Iraq, or about his efforts to gain United Nations backing for military action.

On a third point, these officials said there was discussion about a commitment, suggested by Democrats, that would make clear that any military action in Iraq would not come at the expense of the overall war against terrorism.

The House and Senate both are expected to vote on Iraq legislation before adjourning for the elections. Approval is expected in both houses, although House Democrats say the size of Bush's victory will depend, in part, on the administration's willingness to address Democratic concerns in the private negotiations.

While Congress is expected to bless military action against Iraq, several Democrats have suggested in recent weeks that the persistent talk of war was in part an attempt by Republicans to divert election-year attention from the faltering economy, health care and other domestic concerns.

Former Vice President Al Gore  touched on the issue in a speech in California on Monday, saying that Bush was "demanding in this high political season" that Congress authorize the use of military force.

Despite a daylong effort by Republicans to rebut his charge, Daschle returned to the Senate floor near the end of the day to renew it. "This is politicization pure and simple. I meant it this morning and I mean it now," he said.

Daschle's words were triggered by a comment Bush made Monday during a political trip to Trenton, N.J., and was a variation on a theme that's become a staple of his campaign-style speeches.

Speaking of a debate over legislation to create a Department of Homeland Security, Bush said, "The House responded, but the Senate is more interested in special interests in Washington and not interested in the security of the American people. I will not accept a Department of Homeland Security that does not allow this president and future presidents to better keep the American people secure."

The South Dakota Democrat said it was the latest in a long string of statements from the Bush administration and Republican political strategists that linked the war against terrorism and the possibility of war in Iraq with political considerations.

He cited previous remarks made by White House chief of staff Andrew Card, by the president's top political strategist, Karl Rove, and a Republican pollster.

Daschle said he had been asked repeatedly in recent months whether the war was being politicized, and if so, whether the White House was behind it.

"And I said: 'Without question, I can't bring myself to believe that it is. I can't believe that any president or administration would politicize the war.'"

But now, Daschle said, "even the president" has been quoted as saying that the Democratic-controlled Senate is "not interested in the security of the American people."

Several Democrats were present in the Senate when Daschle spoke, including Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, who lost an arm in combat in World War II.

"The president ought to apologize to Senator Inouye and every veteran who has fought in every war who is a Democrat in the Senate. He ought to apologize to the American people. That is wrong," Daschle said.


Last updated: September 08, 2005.

To contact the Network, write to: nnewai@usa.com.  

Or Call us at: (650) 326-9057.

For problems or questions regarding this web contact mailto:NNEWAI@peacehost.net.

You Visitor # to this page

Hit Counter

Since September 12, 2002