NATIONAL NETWORK

 to

END THE WAR

AGAINST IRAQ


Map of Network Members

                         
 

 

  • Here is the key point of the article below which is well buried (as
    expected):

    "It [US administration] was particularly angered by Senhor Bustanis moves
    to woo Iraq, which Washington hardliners believe will make any military attack on Baghdad more difficult."


       America forces out UN arms director
       By Michael Binyon

  •    April 23, 2002  The Times

       JOSÉ BUSTANI, the embattled director-general of the world body
       monitoring chemical weapons, was dismissed yesterday when most of the
       member states supported an American move to oust him.

       Forty-eight of the 145 members of the Organisation for the Prevention
       of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) voted to dismiss Senhor Bustani, the first
       head of the organisation, who was re-elected for a further four years
       last May. Only seven countries supported him; a further 43 abstained.

       A stormy two-day meeting in The Hague heard lengthy accusations
       against him by the Americans, although the US delegate was booed when
       he failed to produce the promised evidence. After the vote a
       devastated Senhor Bustani stormed out of the conference hall, threw
       his hands in the air and said he had lost his job.

       The Americans accused the Brazilian head of the OPCW of a habit of
       refusing to consult with member states and cited his proposed new
       anti-terrorism measures after September 11, which were not first
       cleared with the US.

       The State Department called his management disastrous and blamed him
       for not resigning after losing a vote of confidence last month. It
       accused him of threatening inspections in five unspecified countries
       for political ends.

       Senhor Bustani gave an impassioned defence of his tenure. He called
       the US accusations against him false and said that the meeting would
       decide whether genuine multiculturalism will survive, or whether it
       will be replaced by unilateralism in a multilateral disguise. He
       added: I refuse to resign under pressure from a small handful of
       member states. He said before the vote that his dismissal would be
       illegal because the convention does not allow for such a dismissal.

       America called the special session of the OPCW to force him out and
       was supported by Britain, Germany and all European Union and Nato
       countries, with most of Eastern Europe and several former Soviet
       states.

       Those supporting him were Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, Belarus, Mexico
       and his own country, Brazil. Most of Africa, Asia and Latin America
       abstained.

       The United States had co-sponsored Senhor Bustani for re-election, but
       the change of Administration in Washington led to a swift reappraisal.
       The Bush Administration, determined not to be bound by multilateral
       agreements, has resented the restrictions of the Chemical Weapons
       Convention. It was particularly angered by Senhor Bustanis moves to
       woo Iraq, which Washington hardliners believe will make any military
       attack on Baghdad more difficult.

       Senhor Bustani accused the White House of trying to push him out
       because of his independence from Washington. He said that he had been
       blamed for seeking Iraqs membership of the Chemical Weapons
       Convention, even though that was in full accordance with the United
       Nations Security Council decision.

       American officials have briefed intensively but anonymously against
       Senhor Bustani. One said that his lapses are not legal crimes;
       nonetheless they are severe mismanagement policies, which
       significantly impede the effectiveness of the organisation.

       Several EU countries said privately they feared that unless they voted
       with the United States, America, which pays more than a fifth of the
       budget, would walk out of the UN body. The US has paid only half this
       years dues and the OPCW is deeply in debt.

       A senior member of the OPCW said after the vote that the American
       arm-twisting was clearly horrendous. He said: We are now living in a
       completely different world.

       Copyright 2002 Times Newspapers Ltd.

  •  

  •    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,3-276297,00.html
     

  •